Members have pointed out a certain shift in tone...
Company Announcement, 12/9/2003:
"the differences between the negotiators are not actually that wide"
Company Announcement, 26/9/2003:
"What we aren’t seeing as good value is being forced into negotiating with Amicus under duress and against some unreasonable and immovable positions."
What makes this all the more remarkable is that NO TALKS took place between these dates. Presumably this means that the company were close to accepting our "unreasonable and immovable positions"? Or maybe we just weren't that unreasonable?
Posted by IA at September 26, 2003 01:27 PM