February 21, 2009
Fujitsu Manchester, Report from EGM
Thanks to all the members who took part in Friday’s Manchester members’ meeting. Apologies to those who had to stand up.
This is a summary of the key points:
- Members voted to accept the company’s improved pay offer. The company has been notified of this decision, so the company will begin implementation. Members were clear that while it isn’t a great deal, it is better than in the rest of the company and includes a number of points that make the pay system fairer which can be built on in the future.
- Make sure you are having the right discussions with your manager in time to influence their pay review decisions:
- Those who attended the meeting were provided with a confidential UNITE briefing pack on Fujitsu’s 2009 pay and benefit scales. Please remember that these are strictly confidential – if anyone else wants a copy, please direct them to a rep. Arrangements will be made to provide copies of the briefing to other members in the near future.
- Know which pay system you are on, where you are in the structure, and what the relevant pay and benefit scales are for you.
- If you’re on the D1-4 pay system (TSS/1, TSS/2 and TSM/1 staff in helpdesks), make sure you’ve had your D1-4 level reviewed with your manager and you know what level you are. You should also pay attention to your Rise+ assessment – though this won’t be used this year, it could affect you in the future.
- If you’re not on the D1-D4 system, use your salary, the median for your role and your PAC rating to work out how much of a rise you’ll get from the matrix (on top of your cost of living rise and any discretionary rise).
- If you had a disturbance allowance consolidated in 2007, make sure your manager knows this and argue for an extra discretionary rise on that basis.
- This is a proper pay agreement, so if you believe your management are not sticking to it, please contact your reps as soon as possible.
- UNITE is having a major mobilisation for the “Put People First!” demonstration in London on 28th March in advance of the G20 summit where world leaders will be discussing their response to the economic crisis. Transport is being laid on from around the country and we are keen to ensure we have a sizeable delegation. If you are interested in attending, please get in touch as soon as possible.
- The election for the UNITE Joint General Secretary from the Amicus section is under way. If you joined before 2 February 2009 and who have not received a ballot paper by Wednesday 25 February 2009 you should contact the Elections Department on 0800 7313407.
- Many employees have been joining the union. The big difference between our pay deal and the company “guidelines” used in the rest of the company is a powerful argument for union organisation. On a more individual basis, union members are the only ones with access to pay and benefit guidelines to help them take advantage of the deal, as the company still insists on keeping non-members in the dark. Please keep recruiting your workmates – the stronger we are the more effective we can be.
- We will be holding our Annual General Meeting (AGM) in March, where we can assess how the pay review is going, elect our reps etc.
Posted by IMH at
06:23 PM
|
Comments (0)
February 14, 2009
Manchester Pay Offer #2
UNITE has received a new “firm offer” for 2009 pay review for the Manchester bargaining unit. This is the result of the stage 2 talks.
Manchester Pay Offer #2
The “stage 2” talks produced a second “firm offer” from the company on Friday. UNITE has published the pay offer on CafeVIK, and it is also reproduced below.
The second offer is a vast improvement on the first one, which was overwhelmingly rejected by members.
UNITE is holding lunchtime report back meetings where you can ask questions, discuss the offer and give your views. These are open to all employees:
Wednesday 18th February, 34GCR2. Sessions 12-1pm and 1-2pm.
Your reps then intend to hold an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) later in the week where its members can vote on whether or not to accept the offer. Look out for the notices including the details of this.
For comparison, the original pay claim is included in our newsletter from October.
Your reps have not yet had an opportunity to discuss whether to make a recommendation for acceptance or rejection of the offer. Assessing the merits of the offer has been made more difficult because of the late, incomplete and inaccurate information provided by the company.
Here are some high-lights and low-lights:
- 2.5% pot, plus promotions, plus bringing people up to their “lower comparator”
- 1% or £200 “cost of living” increase, whichever is the greater
- Matrices to provide a clearer link between pay and performance
- No increase to D1-D4 pay scales, but clarity that they have no defined maximum
- Risk that employees not on D1-D4 system and who had disturbance allowances consolidated could get less than they deserve from the matrix
- Improved rights to the correct benefits for your role
- A timescale to work on implementation of the previous commitments about promotions, but little progress on pay progression and no progress on “acting up” above your role
- Protection against changes to your appraisal result without your knowledge
- Not a complete ban on wasting the pay pot for bonuses instead of pay rises, but it can only happen for “Outstanding” performers above the top of the pay band.
- No overnight allowance for working away
- Extra mileage allowance for sharing a car on business trips, but no allowance for overnight stays away from home
- Cheap annual bus tickets, which you can pay for by deduction from salary
Text of Pay Offer #2
|
Company 2009 Pay Offer -13th February
Thank you for your pay claim of 20th October 2008.
This year’s pay review is set against the background of an unprecedented global economic situation. While the impact on the company is not likely to be as dramatic as for those in other sectors we are finding already that customers, mindful of their financial positions, are pushing us to reduce charges and are reconsidering future plans. We need therefore to be even more mindful than usual of expenditure in order to maintain our competitive position in the marketplace.
Despite the uncertainty that this situation causes, the Company is pleased to be able to offer a pay review from 1st April 2009.
Outlined below is the 2009 Company Pay offer for employees within the Unite Manchester bargaining unit.
Pay Principles – April 2009 review
We have previously indicated that a priority will be rewarding high levels of performance, balanced against a review of an individual’s salary relative to the internal comparators for their role. We have also indicated the need to ensure some discretionary pay budget is available to Managers to recognise additional factors such as the size of an individual’s role and scarcity of their skill-set. The guidelines for the “standard” pay review also include key principles to which we will adhere.
At the outset of negotiations, we agreed a collective goal to ensure the pay review is easy to understand, equitable and agreed as soon as possible, to ensure it can be implemented for 1st April 2009.
We have a budget of 2.5% for the April 2009 pay review. If additional funds become available during the year, employees in the bargaining unit will have access to these on the same basis as those outside of the bargaining unit.
If Managers have difficulty meeting the commitments outlined below, due to the pay and performance profile of the individuals they manage in the bargaining unit, they should raise this up their management chain for assistance.
Company Pay Offer – 2009 review
- This offer applies to all employees within the UNITE Manchester bargaining unit, except for five employees on the Graduate Scheme whose pay is managed centrally.
- Most employees are managed on a pay system based on the median pay of Fujitsu Services’ UK employees in a particular professional community role. Employees in Customer Services’ Region 1 Service Desks on role codes TSS1, TSS2 and TSM1 are managed on the “D1-D4” pay system. In addition there are thirty-five employees not on the D1-D4 system for whom no median pay figure is available.
- When referring to an individual’s basic pay, this is the individual’s “reference” salary i.e. before any Salary Swap choices.
- The lower comparator for employees managed on the “medians” is 75% of the median for their role. The lower comparator for employees managed on the D1-D4 system is the minimum figure defined for their D1-D4 level within their professional community role.
- For part-time employees, pay, comparators, increases etc will be calculated pro-rata in relation to a full-time employee with a 37 hour week, except for employees in TSS/1 in Customer Services Engineering or TSS/1, TSS/2 and TSM/1 in Customer Services Service Desks where a 40 hour week is the norm.
- Where relevant, employees will receive an increase to bring their basic pay to the applicable lower comparator. This will be funded outside of the 2.5% budget and the pay review will be calculated on the basis of this increased rate of pay.
For clarity, for those managed on the D1-D4 framework, this relates to their D1-D4 level prior to the review and not progression up the D1-D4 structure this year which is dealt with separately below.
- All employees will then receive a 1% or £200 increase in basic pay, whichever is the larger (but see section 4 above on part time employees). This “cost of living” increase is calculated based on the individual’s pay after any increase to bring them up to their lower comparator.
- For employees managed under the D1-D4 framework, the following will also apply:
i) Managers are having 1:1 reviews with each employee to compare their capability against the D1-D4 criteria and determine their new level.
ii) As in the past, D1-D4 scales are based on capability (including performance) as set out in the level descriptions. Work not being available at the level of the employee’s capability is not a reason for refusing progression up the levels. Employees will never be moved down their D1-4 scale unless this is a disciplinary sanction.
iii) An increase (where applicable) to bring the basic pay up to the relevant lower comparator for their latest D1-D4 level.
iv) An increase (where applicable) to basic pay of at least that set out in the matrix below, based on performance (PAC) and current pay.
v) An increase (where applicable) to basic pay allocated at managers discretion (see below) and within the pay budget.
- For employees managed using the medians, the following will also apply:
i) An increase (where applicable) to basic pay of at least that set out in the matrix below, based on performance (PAC) and current pay, and,
ii) An increase (where applicable) to basic pay allocated at managers’ discretion (see below) and within the pay budget.
- For employees with no median available, the “100% of median” column from the matrix for non D1-D4 employees will be used.
- When allocating any discretionary increases, Managers should consider:
- Awarding a discretionary increase to employees who had a disturbance allowance consolidated into basic pay in October 2007, as this part of their pay was compensation for additional costs incurred by the employee. This is to ensure that pay increases are still equitable after the matrix has been applied. For the 2009 pay review the company will provide pay planning managers with details of these allowances.
- the pay principles outlined above
- employees whose pay falls near the boundary of the bands defined in the matrices below (to avoid anomalies)
In principle this discretionary element of the pay review should all be allocated to increases in basic pay rather than non-consolidated bonuses. The only possible exceptions are specified in the notes to the matrices.
- Having reviewed our current D1-D4 pay guidelines and the scales applicable to staff managed on the D1-D4 system against our market benchmarking data, our attrition rates, feedback from our recruitment partners and against the increasingly competitive market conditions it has been decided that we will not be increasing the pay scales for these roles. It should be remembered that whilst we are not increasing the pay scales, all those already in these roles will receive a pay increase as part of this review.
- If, as part of the normal moderation process, changes to PAC ratings are proposed, these will only be changed following discussion with the employee.
- Promotional pay rises in April and throughout the year must be clearly distinguished from the pay increases above and funded outside of the budget. For clarity, the term “promotion” is used to mean a change in an individual’s Professional Community Role Code to one with a higher guideline rate of pay. On promotion, an employee is normally paid at least the lower comparator for their new role. Except by agreement with the Union, the only exception to this would be where a lower rate of pay was agreed as part of the acceptance of an “alternative job” (as opposed to a “suitable alternative job”) during redeployment. Any exception will include a plan with specified performance criteria to raise pay to at least their lower guideline level within a year, provided those criteria are met.
- When an employee changes professional community role, their benefit levels will be reviewed. If the employee’s benefits (e.g. medical, bonus, car) are below the lower guideline level for their role, they will normally be increased to that level. Any exception will be discussed with the employee and an appropriate plan (with timescales) agreed with them, identifying what is required for the company to increase the benefit level to the lower guideline level.
- It was agreed in 2005 that on promotion, an immediate review should take place with a plan agreed with the individual to include reward and development. By August 2009, the Company will implement a mechanism to monitor and ensure that this consistently takes place. The first meeting with UNITE to discuss this will be by the end of May 2009.
- The Company is currently reviewing the Expenses Policy and has already decided in principle that it will introduce a mileage allowance for car sharing on business trips. This change will be communicated to employees through the normal channels.
- As part of its Corporate Responsibility programme, the Company is already developing national schemes to allow employees to purchase annual bus passes at favourable rates and by deduction from salary. When finalised, this change will be communicated to employees.
- The Company will work with Unite to ensure that this agreement has been implemented fully and fairly. The company will provide information to allow Unite to monitor this by the end of May 2009.
- The Company is committed to spending the 2.5% budget on pay rises effective from 1st April 2009. If, due to any miscalculation, any of the budget remains after the pay review, the Company will discuss this with Unite and agree how to spend the remaining money on employees.
- The Company will work with UNITE to create a single Manchester Pay Agreement incorporating the content from this offer with the previous commitments, to make future pay negotiations clearer and simpler. The aim is to have this completed by 23rd April 2009 and the first meeting will be in March.
- By 1st April 2009 the Company and UNITE will document the company position on the various points in the pay claim and the union’s outline proposals that have not been included in this offer.
MATRICES
Both parties recognise that there are a number of conflicting and legitimate priorities to address in the pay review. In arriving at the figures in this matrix, a balance had to be struck between them due to the limited funds available.
This is the first year using a matrix to provide a transparent link between performance and pay for people in the bargaining unit. Remember that the increases indicated in the matrices are minimums, not maximums, are in addition to the “cost of living” increase and increases at managers’ discretion are also available.
[Matrices and pay scales omitted on website]
I appreciate your cooperative approach to these negotiations and trust this is an offer you can recommend to your members.
Yours sincerely
Larry Upton
Employee Relations Manager
Fujitsu Services.
|
Posted by IMH at
05:39 PM
|
Comments (0)
February 10, 2009
Obituary – Bill Whitehurst
It is with great sadness that we learned that Bill Whitehurst died on Monday. Bill was part of the wave of unionisation in ICL in the 1970s, and despite having left the company long ago, remained as our branch treasurer until last year, when he stepped down for health reasons.
Bill will be greatly missed, and our thoughts are with his family and in particular his widow Jackie.
If you knew Bill and want the details of his funeral when they become available, please contact your reps.
Posted by IMH at
04:38 PM
|
Comments (0)
Manchester: Branch Report & Next Meeting
The last meeting of UNITE’s Greater Manchester IT branch took place on Thursday 5th February. As well as workplace matters, discussion included:
- Ian Allinson gave a report from the recent UNITE Executive Council (EC) meeting, highlighting some welcome decisions for our industrial sector.
The EC had approved a statement on the situation in Gaza. In the light of this, the branch decided to affiliate to the Stop the War Coalition, to make a donation of £100 to Medical Aid for Palestinians and to encourage members to contribute too.
- There was a discussion about the election for the UNITE Joint General Secretary from the Amicus section. Laurence Faircloth, the candidate nominated by our branch, has withdrawn from the election, leaving four candidates – Kevin Coyne, Jerry Hicks, Paul Reuter and Derek Simpson. Ballot papers will be issued by Electoral Reform Services to arrive week commencing 16 February and members are encouraged to use their vote.
- The branch agreed to send a delegation to the trade union conference on climate change, which is taking place in London on 7th March. If you are interested in being part of this delegation, please get in touch as soon as possible. John Garvani and Ian Allinson from Fujitsu attended this event last year, and you can read Ian’s reports online. There will also be a delegation from our industrial sector of UNITE, with delegates from Ericsson and Panasonic.
- The Employment Tribunal hearing for Karen Reissmann, the local nurse and UNISON activist who had been sacked for speaking out in defence of the NHS, was stopped when the two parties reached a settlement, the details of which are confidential. People present at the tribunal report that the chair of the tribunal had made a number of statements that were extremely unhelpful to Karen and to other people in her situation in future. As Karen was having to raise the legal costs herself (UNISON having withdrawn legal support), she could not have afforded to take the case to a higher court to challenge the outcome. The out of court settlement, which both parties say they are happy with, means that the tribunal has made no ruling.
- The branch decided to donate £50 to Unite Against Fascism (UAF) to assist with their campaign against the BNP, whose policies threaten every trade unionist. UAF is holding a national conference on 21st February and it was agreed to publicise this to members to see who is interested in attending. UAF is organising lots of local activities in response to the threat that the BNP could win a seat to represent the north-west in the forthcoming Euro-elections.
- There was a discussion about the recent wildcat strikes in construction, the genuine issues which had led to them and the need to ensure that campaigns were clearly directed against employers and the government rather than at groups of workers from other countries.
The next meeting of the Greater Manchester IT branch will be:
5:30-7pm, Thursday 5th March
MAN34 GCR2
All branch members are encouraged to attend.
Posted by IMH at
04:37 PM
|
Comments (0)
Guidance for Members on Discussing Pay with their Manager
UNITE held workshops for members on 23rd January, to discuss how to have the conversations with your manager about objectives, appraisals, pay etc. This included how to use the company’s (generally secret) 2009 pay and benefit comparators. As usual, UNITE is preparing a briefing pack including these comparators for distribution to members.
By popular demand, here are some of the key recommendations:
- Talk to your manager early and often!
- ‘Use the lingo’, i.e. be able to use Performance+ terms in appraisals and conversations with your manager.
- Know your role code.
- Get familiar with your role profile and its parameters, e.g. Competencies, KPIs.
- Objectives - insist on ones you can exceed, not just achieve. When discussing new objectives, ask “what would I need to do to exceed?”
- Exceedable objectives – for an example argue for an O not an A if 100% record on timesheet submissions.
- Be prepared to argue for a higher PAC rating (appraisal score) if you’ve contributed extra value even where not explicitly mentioned in objectives.
- If certain role competencies or generic objectives are not relevant to your job, argue if necessary that they should be discounted.
- If circumstances beyond your control have prevented you achieving an objective, argue for it to be not scored at all, rather than for you to be marked down on it.
- Not all objectives have equal weight. It’s common to have lots of “admin” objectives but one or two huge ones that actually relate to doing your job. Managers shouldn’t just “average” the scores against the various objectives.
- Your appraisal should be more than just an “objectives review”. If you are very good at your job, you probably get set more challenging objectives than a beginner. Your PAC should reflect your performance against the role profile, not just your personal objectives.
- Check your online appraisal after it’s been to the reviewing manager, ensure that apart from their comments nothing has changed to your detriment.
- Enter comments on your appraisal when you have the chance, if you don’t like it, object!
- Personal Development Plans – everybody must have one, use it to help you.
- Know what pay system you’re on.
- Know the pay and benefit scales for your role, and for potential future roles.
- Idea - could ask for at least enough pay rise to maintain the same relative position against the median as you had last year (applies where median has increased!)
It seems likely this year’s pay deal will go some way to creating a closer link between pay and how well you do what job. This means you need to take the Performance Plus process much more seriously, as it is likely to actually affect your pay in future. It’s worth taking the time to prepare properly for discussions with your manager about objectives, appraisals and pay.
Posted by IMH at
04:34 PM
|
Comments (0)
Manchester: Rise+ or D1-4 – Helpdesk Pay
A “stage 1” grievance meeting was held on 4th February to discuss the outstanding concerns and questions raised by UNITE in relation to the new Rise+ job and pay structure for helpdesk staff in TSS1, TSS2 and TSM1 roles.
Following the meeting, the company sent UNITE the following “position statement”:
|
Position Statement on RISE+
Our approach to development within role in our Service Desk operation has for many years developed through the D1-D4 framework. This framework looked at capabilities and exampled at each level how an employee could progress their capability.
Approximately 18 months ago, we looked at improving D1-D4 through linking more comprehensively to the company competencies and the role specific technical and behavioural competencies. This review involved people from our desks, the HR team, and our People Development Advisers. A pilot was launched and a roll- out plan for RISE+ created.
Across the UK our Desks have embraced this approach and feedback informs us that our employees:
· Appreciate the transparency on recognising achievement
· Like the Desk profiles and the examples of capability at each level, illustrating how personal development within a role can occur
· Understand how the information collated assists in the performance plus processes on appraisal and personal development planning
· Can link their individual capability to the delivery of results
In Manchester D1-D4 has been the bedrock for development and pay review, in Service Desks. It is recognised following feedback and meetings with your Unite Representatives that applying the new RISE+ approach at a time of pay negotiation in Manchester could concern some people. As a result of the issues raised and discussed we have taken the decision to de-link RISE+ from our pay planning process this year and concentrate on using it for its primary purpose – staff development. The result of this is that we will, as in previous years, utilise the D1-D4 approach to feed into our pay planning process.
RISE+ has been integral to the appraisal discussions and the data collected will be invaluable for this year’s personal development planning and discussions our employees have with their managers throughout the year.
We are committed to working with Unite on the replacement of D1-D4 with RISE+ and linking it to the reward processes in future years.
Debbie Stirrop & Richard Batty – Customer Services
|
This means that there will be time to iron out the remaining issues with RISE+ before it is introduced for pay purposes in Manchester, and that the company will use the D1-4 system for the April pay review.
If you are on the D1-4 system (typically helpdesk staff in TSS1, TSS2 and TSM1 roles) it is vitally important that you know which D1-4 level you are on, to ensure you are paid correctly. If your capability has improved since your level was last reviewed, you should ensure your manager reviews this with you as soon as possible.
For reference, the D1-4 pay scales from the 2008 pay review were:
TSS1: £14,500 - £16,500
D1 (min) 14,500 / D2 (min) 15,000 / D3 (min) 15,500 / D4 (min) 16,000
TSS2: £16,500 - £18,500
D1 (min) 16,500 / D2 (min) 17,000 / D3 (min) 17,500 / D4 (min) 18,000
Team Manager: £21,000 - £29,000
D1 (min) 21,000 / D2 (min) 23,000 / D3 (min) 25,000 / D4 (min) 27,000
The company also committed:
D1-D4 scales are based on capability (including performance) as set out in the level descriptions. Work not being available at the level of capability of the employee’s capability is not a reason for refusing progression up the levels. Employees will never be moved down their D1-4 scale unless this is a disciplinary sanction. Employees will be paid within the band for their scale, discounting any consolidated disturbance allowance as set out above.
Posted by IMH at
04:33 PM
|
Comments (0)
Result of Vote on Initial Manchester Pay Offer
On Friday UNITE circulated to members the company’s initial “firm offer” on pay for the Manchester bargaining unit, and asked them to vote to accept or reject it.
Members have overwhelmingly decided to reject this initial offer. Talks will resume at stage two of the agreed procedure on Thursday. The company has assured UNITE that there is still ample time to reach an agreement which can be implemented in the April pay packet.
If you haven’t already done so, please complete and return our latest pay survey.
UNITE has complained to the company about some managers and HR continuing to spread false information about the pay review, despite the joint notice that was sent out by Communicating on 26th January in response to the initial incidents. A key section of this notice read:
|
For the avoidance of doubt for those in the bargaining unit, there will be a pay review for you, it will be carried out by your manager and increases will be effective from the same date as those outside the bargaining unit.
As stated in the Recognition Agreement, the company and the union are committed to encouraging effective relationships between each employee and their manager, between union members and their representatives, and between the company and the union. The Company recognises the benefits of collective bargaining as an efficient and effective mechanism for dealing with issues that affect groups of employees.
The company has committed to ensuring that its managers and HR team act in accordance with this approach, and to actively policing compliance.
|
Don’t forget that there will be further sessions (open to all employees) to report back on the progress of negotiations:
Wednesday 18 February, 34GCR2. Sessions 12-1pm and 1-2pm.
Posted by IMH at
04:28 PM
|
Comments (0)
February 06, 2009
Manchester Pay Offer #1
UNITE has received the company’s first “firm offer” for 2009 pay review for the Manchester bargaining unit.
Manchester Pay Offer #1
The company had indicated that they would provide an initial “firm offer” by the end of last week. UNITE finally received the offer on Thursday 5th February.
UNITE had asked the company to provide the offer even though it was clear that there would be major gaps in it, and that these gaps would make it impossible for the reps to recommend acceptance at this stage. Your reps wanted to circulate the offer to members so that you could see what progress had been made and give feedback to your reps.
The offer reads as follows:
|
Company 2009 - Pay Offer – 3rd February 2009
Thank you for your pay claim of the 20th October 2008.
This year’s pay review is set against the background of an unprecedented global economic situation. While the impact on the company is not likely to be as dramatic as for those in other sectors we are finding already that customers, mindful of their financial positions, are pushing us to reduce charges and are reconsidering future plans. We need therefore to be even more mindful than usual of expenditure in order to maintain our competitive position in the marketplace.
Despite the uncertainty that this situation causes, the Company is pleased to be able to offer a pay review from 1st April 2009.
Outlined below are the key elements of the 2009 Company Pay offer for employees within the Unite bargaining unit. Other elements that are included within the Draft offer discussed on 26th January have been excluded for the time being as there are still a number of areas that need further discussion, in particular the situation of employees paid under D1-D4/Rise+ arrangements.
Pay Principles - 2009 review
We have previously indicated that a priority will be rewarding high levels of performance, balanced against a review of individual’s salary relative to the internal comparators for their role. We have also indicated the need to ensure some discretionary pay budget is available to Managers to recognise additional factors such as the size of an individual’s role and scarcity of their skill-set. The guidelines for the “standard” pay review also include key principles.
At the outset of negotiations, we agreed a collective goal to ensure the pay review is easy to understand, equitable and agreed as soon as possible, to ensure it can be implemented for 1st April 2009.
We have a budget of 2.5% for this review.
Company Pay Offer – 2009 review
- All employees, other than those managed on the D1-D4 or Rise + scale, whose current salary is below 75% of the median for their role will receive an increase to bring their salary to 75% of the median (full-time equivalent). This will be funded outside of the 2.5% budget.
- A 1% increase in basic pay for all employees within the bargaining unit. This “cost of living” 1% is calculated based on the individual’s salary after any increase to bring them up to 75% of the median.
- An additional increase (where applicable) to basic salary related to individual performance and salary relative to the pay comparators. This increase to be at least that defined on an agreed matrix. This is in addition to the “cost of living” element.
- An additional discretionary increase (where applicable) allocated by Managers in accordance with the principles outlined above and within the overall budget. In principle this should all be allocated to increases in basic salary rather than non-consolidated bonuses. The only exceptions would be where people are paid over 125% of the median with exceptional performance
- The company will provide pay planning managers with details of the disturbance allowances that were consolidated into basic pay in October 2007. In considering the discretionary increases, managers should take into account the fact that this part of their pay was compensation for additional costs incurred by the employee. Impact on D1-D4 employees TBC
- Customer Services employees managed on the D1-4 or Rise+ systems (typically helpdesks) will be paid at least the minimum salary for the relevant D1-D4 or Rise+ scale for their role. This will be funded within the 2.5% budget.
- Changes to Rise+ or D1-4 pay scales and other related points TBC.
- Promotional pay rises must be clearly distinguished from the pay increases above and funded outside of the budget described above. For clarity, the term “promotion” is used to mean a change in an individual’s Professional Community Role code to one with a higher guideline salary. On promotion, an employee is normally paid at least the lower comparator for their new role. Except by agreement with the Union, the only exception to this would be where a lower salary was agreed as part of the acceptance of an “alternative job” (as opposed to a “suitable alternative job”) during redeployment. Any exception will include a plan with specified performance criteria to raise the salary to at least their lower guideline level within a year, provided those criteria are met.
- It was agreed in 2005 that on promotion, an immediate review should take place with a plan agreed with the individual to include reward and development. By August 2009, the Company will implement a mechanism to monitor and ensure that this consistently takes place. The first meeting with UNITE to discuss this will be by the end of May 2009.
- The Company will work with Unite to ensure that this agreement has been implemented fully and fairly. The company will provide information to allow Unite to monitor this by the end of May 2009.
- The Company is committed to spending the 2.5% budget on pay rises effective from 1st April 2009. If, due to any miscalculation, any of the budget remains after the pay review, the Company will discuss this with Unite and agree how to spend the remaining money on employees.
Larry Upton
Employee Relations Manager
4th February 2009
|
For comparison, the original pay claim is included in our newsletter from October. Since then, the rate of price inflation has fallen sharply (latest figures are to December). It is now 0.9% measured by RPI and 3.1% measured by CPI (favoured by government, but less relevant). However, the company’s performance continues to be strong, so this year represents an opportunity for the company to reverse some of the decline in real wages that employees have suffered in recent years.
Given that there are large gaps in this initial firm offer, your reps cannot recommend acceptance. The company is already working on additional points which we anticipate being included in a subsequent offer. If you reject the offer, talks will resume on 12th February, and the company has confirmed that this still allows plenty of time for agreement to be reached and for a deal to be implemented in the April pay packet.
Your reps would also welcome your feedback on the content of the offer and which missing points you believe are most important to include.
Posted by IMH at
04:24 PM
|
Comments (0)
February 02, 2009
Manchester Pay Update
The company had indicated that they would provide an initial “firm offer” by the end of last week. This did not happen. However, the company has provided an update.
Don’t forget today’s lunchtime sessions to report back on the talks:
· Monday 2nd February, 35GCR1. Sessions 12-1pm and 1-2pm. Report on negotiations. Focus on new Rise+ job and pay structure for helpdesks. Open to all employees.
The pay claim itself is included in the most recent UNITE “one per desk” newsletter, while another document outlines UNITE’s draft proposals on promotion and pay progression.
Please come along so that you are well informed when you are asked to take a decision on the company’s pay offer. Your reps are keen to report on the progress of talks and get your feedback.
Why not bring your workmates along – whether they are UNITE members or not?
Feel free to bring your lunch – these will be informal sessions.
Posted by IMH at
04:19 PM
|
Comments (0)